Understand what drives growth.
Simulate future events.
Invest where it matters most.

AD cube Marketing Mix Modeling quantifies how each channel contributes to business results, accounting for seasonality, market conditions and cross-channel effects. It then allows teams to compare budget scenarios and identify where future investment can generate the greatest impact.

What sets us apart

More than a traditional MMM.

Weekly granularity

What sets our MMM apart isn't just reading week by week, it's delivering insights at weekly detail. That's what makes it actionable: a tactical, operational view you can act on over shorter horizons, without losing sight of the long-term picture.

A proprietary Bayesian model

Hierarchical Bayesian models identify relationships that are difficult to observe manually and quantify uncertainty, instead of hiding it behind a single deterministic output.

Multi-country & multi-line

MMM also works on specific product lines or multi-country strategies, we'll define the right configuration together with your team.

Go deeper into MMM

MMM and Core

Where the model sits next to AD cube Core.

Both decide about budget, at different altitudes. The Marketing Mix Model works across channels, week by week. Core works inside the campaigns, day by day.

Marketing Mix Model and AD cube Core compared
Marketing Mix ModelAD cube Core
LayerChannelCampaign
CadenceWeeklyDaily
What it decidesHow much to invest, and whereWhere to move budget while campaigns are running
Who uses itMarketing director, finance, managementIn-house performance team
Includes offlineYesNo

The two are independent, and they work well together: the model sets the plan, Core executes inside it.

A more disciplined way to optimise budget.

  • Baseline
  • Media contribution
  • Total
baselinetvsearchsocialotherpromorevenue Contribution to revenue (index, base year = 100)
Budget shifted0% Revenue index100.0 vs baseline+0.0
Each bar adds a channel’s incremental contribution, read left to right from the baseline to the total. Move the slider and the total re-estimates at equal spend: TV builds a broad base, social compounds, and the model separates the two instead of crediting the last click.

Past monitoring

Read past performance as a system, not as isolated channel reports.

Select a monthly or weekly view to compare each channel’s share of spend with its share of measured effect, one of several diagnostic views in the platform. Where the two diverge, allocation may be inefficient.

Weekly monitoring

Read monthly or weekly, the view compares budget allocation and revenue contribution across each channel, with online and offline activity inside the same analytical logic.

Channel deep dive

Each channel can then be examined through its own saturation curve and history, showing where investment is still responsive and where returns begin to flatten.

    Channel —
    Share of spend —
    Share of effect —
    Effect vs. spend —

    Good to know

    Designed for the conditions marketing teams actually work in.

    Data ingestion and configuration

    The model is configured around the client’s real operating structure: channels, markets, time windows, offline activity, online platforms, reporting needs and available historical data.

    Built for imperfect data

    The model adapts to incomplete or disorderly data as it is, instead of asking every company to fit a standard configuration before it can produce value.

    AI-assisted reporting

    Its natural-language reports then turn the output into clear explanations for marketing, finance and management, while keeping the full analytical detail available for specialists.

    Future optimization

    Simulate a plan before you commit to it.

    Build a what-if scenario around a specific time period, a planned budget or a revenue target. As the point moves, expected revenue and ROAS change with it, making the spend-return trade-off visible before budget is committed.

    A future-planning view

    Scenarios can be built around the horizon that matters, weekly or monthly, and expanded into further plots: suggested allocation by channel, expected ROAS by channel, marginal returns and other diagnostics to compare options before the plan is approved.

    Budget— Expected fatturato_eur— Expected ROAS—

    Next steps

    Pricing should reflect the complexity of the decision suite.

    MMM is usually shaped around the number of channels, markets, integrations, historical depth and support required. The proposal is therefore configured around the actual operating context, not around a generic package.

    hello@adcube.ai